From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Green

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 1, 2015
134 A.D.3d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

16258 4119/12.

12-01-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward GREEN, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ellen Stanfield Friedman of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ellen Stanfield Friedman of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered June 14, 2013, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of seven years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly declined to charge petit larceny as a lesser included offense, since there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, that he stole property without using force. Defendant either participated in a robbery or committed no crime; there was no evidence to support a theory that he somehow “opportunistically” took the victim's property without being part of the robbery (see e.g. People v. Flores, 28 A.D.3d 380, 812 N.Y.S.2d 534 1st Dept.2006, lv. denied 7 N.Y.3d 755, 819 N.Y.S.2d 881, 853 N.E.2d 252 2006 ).

Defendant's challenges to the prosecutor's summation are entirely unpreserved, notwithstanding his postsummations mistrial motion (see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 911, 912, 828 N.Y.S.2d 274, 861 N.E.2d 89 2006; People v. LaValle, 3 N.Y.3d 88, 116, 783 N.Y.S.2d 485, 817 N.E.2d 341 2004 ), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal. The remarks at issue generally constituted permissible responses to defense counsel's summation arguments, and they did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133, 666 N.Y.S.2d 572 1st Dept.1997, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 976, 672 N.Y.S.2d 855, 695 N.E.2d 724 1998; People v. D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 118–119, 591 N.Y.S.2d 1001 1st Dept.1992, lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 884, 597 N.Y.S.2d 945, 613 N.E.2d 977 1993 ).


Summaries of

People v. Green

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 1, 2015
134 A.D.3d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Green

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward Green…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 1, 2015

Citations

134 A.D.3d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 8788
20 N.Y.S.3d 73

Citing Cases

People v. Wilkerson

Defendant's related claim—that County Court erred in allowing testimony as to defendant's uncharged violation…

People v. Green

Here, the first prong is indisputably met; petit larceny, which is committed when a defendant “steals…