From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1994
202 A.D.2d 206 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 3, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.).


Though "[t]he District Attorney herein did on occasion exceed the bounds of legitimate fair comment", the summation was not so egregious as to deny defendant a fair trial (People v D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 119, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 884). In any event, defense counsel interposed only two objections (see, People v. Briggs, 155 A.D.2d 306, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 867), and any error was harmless in light of overwhelming proof of guilt (see, People v. Perez, 176 A.D.2d 165, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 862).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ross, Asch, Rubin and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Gray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1994
202 A.D.2d 206 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MIKE GRAY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 206 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 778

Citing Cases

People v. Richards

beaten by the police ( see, People v Logan, 25 N.Y.2d 184, 195-196, cert denied 396 U.S. 1020). Defendant did…