From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gosselin

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 5, 2012
493 Mich. 900 (Mich. 2012)

Opinion

Docket No. 145212. COA No. 308923.

2012-12-5

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Rita Ann GOSSELIN, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for correction of the judgment of sentence to delete the requirement that the defendant pay one-third of her restitution obligation before she may be released on parole. The trial court had no authority to impose the restitution obligation as a condition of parole. See People v. Greenberg, 176 Mich.App. 296, 310–311, 439 N.W.2d 336 (1989). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuadedthat the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

People v. Gosselin

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 5, 2012
493 Mich. 900 (Mich. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Gosselin

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Rita Ann GOSSELIN…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Dec 5, 2012

Citations

493 Mich. 900 (Mich. 2012)
493 Mich. 900

Citing Cases

People v. Douglas

The Greenberg panel held that there was no statutory provision granting "the sentencing judge the power to…

People v. Al-Khateeb

People v Greenberg, 176 Mich App 296, 311; 439 NW2d 336 (1989). See also People v Gosselin, 493 Mich 900; 822…