Opinion
December 7, 2000.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Liebovitz, J.), rendered on or about April 2, 1998, unanimously affirmed.
Mark W. Zeno, for defendant-appellant.
Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Wallach, Andrias, Saxe, Buckley, JJ.
Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v. Saunders, 52 A.D.2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant's assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.
Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.
Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.
We have considered the arguments raised in defendant's pro se supplemental brief and find them to be without merit.
Defendant's motion, denominated as one for Coram Nobis Relief, deemed to be one to file a pro se supplemental brief and, as such, granted to the extent of accepting defendant's papers as a brief on this appeal.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.