Opinion
April 17, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (O'Brien, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find that the hearing court properly denied the defendant's motion to suppress his statement to the police. We reject the defendant's contention that the police coerced him into making the statement by delaying his medical care (cf., People v Adams, 64 A.D.2d 712).
The defendant has failed to properly preserve for appellate review his claim that the trial court erred in admitting certain testimony, pursuant to CPL 60.25, relating to the complainant's prior corporeal identification of the defendant (see, CPL 470.05). In any event, we find that under the circumstances of this case the testimony was properly admitted pursuant to CPL 60.25. Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.