From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gonzalez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 25, 2013
109 A.D.3d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-09-25

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Terrence GONZALEZ, appellant.

Gary M. Gash, White Plains, N.Y. (Neal D. Futerfas of counsel), for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Laurie Sapakoff and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.


Gary M. Gash, White Plains, N.Y. (Neal D. Futerfas of counsel), for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Laurie Sapakoff and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), rendered September 28, 2010, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and menacing a police officer or peace officer, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive ( see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145;People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 281, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108;People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 10, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022).

SKELOS, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gonzalez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 25, 2013
109 A.D.3d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Terrence GONZALEZ, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 25, 2013

Citations

109 A.D.3d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 6016
971 N.Y.S.2d 479

Citing Cases

People v. Murphy

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Although the defendant validly waived her right to appeal ( see People…

People v. McNair

The defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be reviewed on direct appeal because they…