From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Goetz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 4, 1962
185 N.E.2d 912 (N.Y. 1962)

Opinion

Argued September 26, 1962

Decided October 4, 1962

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN R. SCHWARTZ, J.

N. Le Van Haver for appellant.

Raymond C. Baratta, District Attorney ( Robert F. Winne of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment reversed and matter remitted to the County Court, Dutchess County, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein: The counts of the indictment, numbered 2, 3, 5 and 6, charging commission of crime on January 8, 1960, dismissed upon the ground that the evidence does not establish defendant's guilt of such crimes beyond a reasonable doubt; as to the remaining counts of the indictment, numbered 8, 9, 11 and 12, charging commission of crimes on January 10, 1960, a new trial is ordered upon the ground that prejudicial error was committed by the trial court in failing adequately to apprise the jury that the pretrial statement of the witness Fetzer could not be considered or relied upon as evidence of defendant's guilt. (See People v. Freeman, 9 N.Y.2d 600, 605; People v. Ferraro, 293 N.Y. 51, 56.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.


Summaries of

People v. Goetz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 4, 1962
185 N.E.2d 912 (N.Y. 1962)
Case details for

People v. Goetz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARD W. GOETZ…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 4, 1962

Citations

185 N.E.2d 912 (N.Y. 1962)
185 N.E.2d 912
233 N.Y.S.2d 476

Citing Cases

People v. Patterson

Furthermore, it was error for the court to refrain from rendering a limiting instruction when the People…

People v. Carroll

Even when the defendant fails to request such an instruction the court must advise the jury that the…