From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Godbold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1994
207 A.D.2d 1008 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 30, 1994

Appeal from the Wayne County Court, Sirkin, J.

Present — Balio, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that the proof is legally insufficient to sustain defendant's conviction. Defendant, appearing upset, approached Officer Freeland, who was administering sobriety tests to defendant's friend. Another officer, providing security for Freeland, directed defendant to stop, but defendant pushed past that officer toward Freeland. That conduct is sufficient to constitute physical interference and obstruction of the official duties being performed by the officers (see, People v. Tarver, 188 A.D.2d 938, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 893). Additionally, the testimony of the officers regarding severe pain from injuries sustained while struggling with defendant, together with the objective evidence concerning those injuries, is sufficient to sustain defendant's conviction of two counts of assault in the second degree (see, Penal Law § 10.00; § 120.05 [3]).

We have reviewed the remaining contentions of defendant and conclude that they are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Godbold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1994
207 A.D.2d 1008 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Godbold

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEROME W. GODBOLD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 1008 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
617 N.Y.S.2d 70

Citing Cases

People v. Lilly

Memorandum: Defendant made an insufficient factual showing to warrant disclosure of all "use of force"…