Opinion
May 12, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (John A.K. Bradley, J.).
Defendant's failure to object to most of the comments in the prosecutor's summation which he now claims were improper renders those claims unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05). We note, however, that the prosecutor should not have commented on the number of times the complainant consistently reported the robbery (People v. Jimenez, 102 A.D.2d 439). This comment was nevertheless harmless in view of overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt.
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.