From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Glass

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 7, 1982
432 N.E.2d 596 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided January 7, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN S. THORP, J.

Dominic J. Sichenzia for appellant.

Denis Dillon, District Attorney ( Martin I. Saperstein of counsel), for respondent.


On summary consideration, order affirmed. Based on the elements of the crime as charged to the jury, we cannot say, as a matter of law, that the jury's verdict acquitting the defendant of the charges of attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the second degree is repugnant to the verdict convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree ( People v Tucker, 55 N.Y.2d 1).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

People v. Glass

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 7, 1982
432 N.E.2d 596 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

People v. Glass

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANGEL F. GLASS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 7, 1982

Citations

432 N.E.2d 596 (N.Y. 1982)
432 N.E.2d 596
447 N.Y.S.2d 703

Citing Cases

People v. Harris

Accordingly, the jury's verdict on the weapon possession and assault counts was not repugnant. (People v.…

People v. DePass

In any event, although there was evidence from which the jury could have concluded that there was a legal…