Opinion
No. 101601.
May 24, 1996.
Leave to Appeal Granted May 24, 1996:
The questions are limited to whether 1) the Legislature intended to require consecutive sentencing for a substantive drug law conviction and a conviction of conspiracy to commit that same drug law offense, where the two convictions arise from a single transaction, and 2) defendant's pleas of guilty constitute a waiver of this argument. The case is to be argued and submitted to the Court together with the case of People v Tucker, No. 103191.
Court of Appeals No. 164750.