From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gelia

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 31, 2023
SC 161126 (Mich. Jan. 31, 2023)

Opinion

SC 161126 COA 344130

01-31-2023

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANTHONY JOSEPH GELIA, Defendant-Appellant.


Jackson CC: 16-005361-FC

Elizabeth T. Clement, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch Kyra H. Bolden, Justices

ORDER

By order of July 16, 2021, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v Poole (Docket No. 161529). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 28, 2022, 510 Mich. (2022), the application is again considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE Part II.B. of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of People v Parks, 510 Mich. (2022) (Docket No. 162086). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Zahra, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I dissent from the part of this Court's order remanding the case for reconsideration in light of People v Parks, 510 Mich. (2022) (Docket No. 162086), which held that Const 1963, art 1, § 16 bars mandatory life-without-parole sentences for 18-year-old homicide offenders. Because defendant was over the age of 18 at the time he committed first-degree murder, he is not entitled to relief under Parks. Therefore, I would deny leave to appeal on all the issues raised in defendant's application.

Viviano, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

For the reasons stated in Chief Justice CLEMENT's dissent in People v Parks, 510 Mich. (2022) (Docket No. 162086), I do not believe that a mandatory sentence to life without parole for a defendant who committed first-degree murder when he was over the age of 17 is unconstitutional. Therefore, I would deny leave to appeal on all of the issues raised by defendant.


Summaries of

People v. Gelia

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 31, 2023
SC 161126 (Mich. Jan. 31, 2023)
Case details for

People v. Gelia

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANTHONY JOSEPH…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jan 31, 2023

Citations

SC 161126 (Mich. Jan. 31, 2023)