From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Garcia

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 4, 2016
139 A.D.3d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

05-04-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Luis GARCIA, appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Steven J. Miraglia of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Diane R. Eisner of counsel; Jana Ruthberg on the memorandum), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Steven J. Miraglia of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Diane R. Eisner of counsel; Jana Ruthberg on the memorandum), for respondent.

Opinion Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cyrulnik, J.), imposed December 17, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People

v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ; cf. People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 341–342, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., DILLON, SGROI, HINDS–RADIX and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Garcia

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 4, 2016
139 A.D.3d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Garcia

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Luis GARCIA, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 4, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
29 N.Y.S.3d 191
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3524