From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gamble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1995
215 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 15, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant's contention that reversible error took place as a result of the prosecutor's summation. The comments made by the prosecutor were proper responses to arguments that defense counsel had made during summation or constituted fair comment on the evidence. Balletta, J.P., Copertino, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gamble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1995
215 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Gamble

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RUFUS GAMBLE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 15, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 945

Citing Cases

People v. Hugennie

05; People v. Tonge, 93 N.Y.2d 838; People v. Scotti, 220 A.D.2d 543). In any event, the comments and conduct…

People v. Fernandez

05; People v. Tonge, 93 N.Y.2d 838; People v. Scotti, 220 A.D.2d 543). In any event, the comments and conduct…