People v. Galarno

Full title: PEOPLE v. GALARNO

Court: Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 14, 1966

142 N.W.2d 871 (Mich. Ct. App. 1966)

142 N.W.2d 871

Opinion

Docket No. 658.

Decided June 14, 1966.

Appeal from Huron; Bach (Arthur M.), J. Submitted Division 2 April 6, 1966, at Lansing. (Docket No. 658.) Decided June 14, 1966.

Dorothy Galarno was convicted of manslaughter. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and John Schubel, Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Thomas R. McAllister, for defendant.

T.G. KAVANAGH, J.

The stormy marriage of William and Dorothy Galarno ended November 11, 1964, when William died as a result of a gunshot wound inflicted on him by Dorothy, November 8, 1964, following an altercation in their house trailer. She was tried for first-degree murder¹ and found guilty of manslaughter² by a jury.

1 CL 1948, § 750.316 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.548). — REPORTER.

2 CL 1948, § 750.321 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.553). — REPORTER.

The appeal asserts as error:

1. The verdict was against the great weight of the evidence.

2. There is no evidence in the record to support a verdict of manslaughter.

3. The verdict was contrary to the law and facts.

4. The court erred in instructing the jury on first-degree murder.

With regard to the first allegation of error, the test in a criminal case is not whether the verdict was against the great weight of the evidence but whether it warrants a finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. People v. Schram (1965), 1 Mich. App. 279;³ People v. Williams (1962), 368 Mich. 494. The record before us satisfies the test laid down in Schram and Williams.

3 This case was affirmed June 8, 1966 on appeal to the Supreme Court, People v. Schram, 378 Mich. 145. — REPORTER.

As to the second, third, and fourth allegations of error, the defendant admitted going into the decedent's bedroom with a gun in her hand, waking him up to discuss a matter he had said he didn't want to talk about, and shooting him shortly thereafter. She claimed the shooting was in self-defense. On defendant's admissions, there was ample evidence to support a verdict of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of first- or second-degree murder.⁴ Thus there was ample evidence to support a verdict of manslaughter. People v. Milhem (1957), 350 Mich. 497. The trial court properly charged the jury on the degrees of murder and on manslaughter.

4 CL 1948, § 750.317 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.549). — REPORTER.

Affirmed.

LESINSKI, C.J., and QUINN, J., concurred.