From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fuzia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 2004
4 A.D.3d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-07291.

Decided February 2, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), rendered September 5, 2001, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree (two counts), vehicular manslaughter in the second degree (two counts), assault in the second degree, vehicular assault in the second degree, and driving while intoxicated, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Raymond E. Kerno, Mineola, N.Y., for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Cameron Kenny of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, THOMAS A. ADAMS and STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his challenges to the legal sufficiency of the prosecution's evidence ( see CPL 470.05). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In addition, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

SANTUCCI, J.P., SCHMIDT, ADAMS and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Fuzia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 2004
4 A.D.3d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Fuzia

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. RONALD J. FUZIA, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 2, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
770 N.Y.S.2d 877

Citing Cases

People v. Shank

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, following a nonjury trial, of felony driving…