From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Frascone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 12, 1991
176 A.D.2d 128 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

September 12, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bonnie Wittner, J.).


At the plea allocution for the robbery and attempted robbery charges, defendant told the Court that he did not actually have a gun when he committed these crimes, but had merely simulated a gun with his hand. The trial court promised to sentence defendant to the minimum term of incarceration on the robbery conviction, to run concurrently with his attempted robbery conviction, in view of the mitigating circumstance that no gun was used or recovered.

Defendant's claim that the plea was legally insufficient is not preserved for appellate review, because he failed to make a post-allocution motion to withdraw the plea (People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 667). In any event, there was no need for the trial court to inquire further into defendant's statements, since the record minutes make clear that defendant's decision to forego a possible affirmative defense was part of a knowing and voluntary plea bargain. (People v. Mitchell, 78 A.D.2d 608.)

Concur — Carro, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Frascone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 12, 1991
176 A.D.2d 128 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Frascone

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GIACOMO FRASCONE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 12, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 128 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
574 N.Y.S.2d 15

Citing Cases

People v. Toxey

pistol he did not have a gun, and that the court erred in failing to inquire whether he understood that he…