Opinion
2013-05-2
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carlos FRANCO, Defendant–Appellant.
Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Malancha Chanda of counsel), for respondent.
Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Malancha Chanda of counsel), for respondent.
Order Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), entered on or about February 1, 2011, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6—C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly assessed 30 points for defendant's prior violent felony conviction even though he had not yet been sentenced on that conviction at the time he committed the underlying sex offense. We find no basis for applying the sequentiality requirement of the predicate felony offender sentencing statutes to the risk factor for prior violent felonies.
Although the Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary for factor 9 indicates that the term “violent felony” will have the same meaning as in Penal Law § 70.02(1), this does not require the wholesale adoption of the recidivist sentencing statutes contained in Penal Law article 70, including § 70.04(1)(b)(ii), which requires that a defendant have been sentenced on the prior violent felony before it may be used as a predicate violent felony for sentencing purposes. The Sex Offender Registration Act is “not a penal statute and the registration requirement is not a criminal sentence” (Matter of North v. Board of Examiners of State of N.Y., 8 N.Y.3d 745, 752, 840 N.Y.S.2d 307, 871 N.E.2d 1133 [2007] ); registration under the statute is not designed to punish, “but rather to protect the public” ( People v. Windham, 10 N.Y.3d 801, 802, 856 N.Y.S.2d 557, 886 N.E.2d 179 [2008] ).CPL § 1.20(13) defines “conviction” as the entry of a plea or verdict of guilty, which occurred here before defendant committed the underlying sex crime ( see People v. Wood 60 A.D.3d 1350, 875 N.Y.S.2d 686 [4th Dept. 2009];Matter of Smith v. Devane, 73 A.D.3d 179, 182, 898 N.Y.S.2d 702 [3d Dept. 2010],lv. denied 15 N.Y.3d 708, 2010 WL 3583191;see also People v. Montilla, 10 N.Y.3d 663, 862 N.Y.S.2d 11, 891 N.E.2d 1175 [2008] ).