From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 1988
136 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

January 25, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reversing the defendant's conviction of criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The Court of Appeals has recently ruled that "[w]hen use of or display of a firearm is an element of a class B felony, the use or display of that same firearm cannot also be the predicate for criminal display of a firearm in the first degree" (People v Brown, 67 N.Y.2d 555, 560, cert denied ___ US ___, 107 S Ct 1307). Therefore, we agree with the defendant herein that her conviction of criminal use of a firearm in the first degree must be reversed. Insofar as the defendant's convictions of robbery in the first degree and burglary in the first degree served as the predicate crimes for her conviction of criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, as conceded by the People, the firearm count should have been dismissed upon the defendant's conviction of the robbery and burglary counts.

The defendant also argues that her guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. We find, however, that the evidence adduced at trial, when viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, was legally sufficient to support the guilty verdict (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the evidence established the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

Finally, we have reviewed the sentence imposed and find that under the circumstances, it was fair and appropriate (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80) and was not unconstitutional as applied to the defendant (see, People v Jones, 39 N.Y.2d 694; People v Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100, cert denied 423 U.S. 950; People v Donovan, 89 A.D.2d 968, affd 59 N.Y.2d 834). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Fong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 1988
136 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Fong

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KELLY FONG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 25, 1988

Citations

136 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)