From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Flores

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1998
255 A.D.2d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 9, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rivera, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's request for a missing-witness charge was untimely ( see, People v. Aguaro, 241 A.D.2d 459; People v. Pendleton, 156 A.D.2d 725). In any event, the People demonstrated that the witness's whereabouts were unknown, and that diligent efforts to locate her were unsuccessful ( see, People v. Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424).

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record fails to support his claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel ( see, People v. Hobot, 84 N.Y.2d 1021; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Sullivan, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Flores

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1998
255 A.D.2d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BENJAMIN FLORES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 848

Citing Cases

People v. Woods

It was not error for the court to replace a sworn juror just prior to the onset of deliberations, after…

People v. Hughes

Further, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's request for…