From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Flores

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.
May 18, 2021
63 Cal.App.5th 1153 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. E072843.

05-18-2021

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CARL RAY FLORES, JR., Defendant and Appellant.


[Modification of opinion (63 Cal.App.5th 368; ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ____).]

THE COURT.—The Court ORDERS the opinion modified by replacing the language in footnote 4 [63 Cal.App.5th 381, advance report, fn. 4] with the following language instead:

Section 1170 is inapplicable because its relevant subdivisions address determinate sentencing, and attempted murder receives an indeterminate sentence. (§ 1170, subds. (a)-(c).) Section 190 is inapplicable because it provides the punishment for murder. (Miranda, supra, 192 Cal.App.4th at p. 415.)

Except for this modification, which does not affect the judgment, the opinion is unchanged.


Summaries of

People v. Flores

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.
May 18, 2021
63 Cal.App.5th 1153 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CARL RAY FLORES, JR., Defendant…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

Date published: May 18, 2021

Citations

63 Cal.App.5th 1153 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021)