From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fleury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 10, 1984
106 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

December 10, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Calabretta, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

We reject defendant's claim that the police improperly conducted a showup instead of a lineup in view of the fact that the showup was conducted at the scene of the robbery about 30 minutes after its commission (see People v. Brnja, 70 A.D.2d 17, affd 50 N.Y.2d 366; People v. Digiosaffatte, 63 A.D.2d 703). We also note that while some of the prosecutor's comments on summation were improper, any errors in that regard were harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt (see People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230). Thompson, J.P., O'Connor, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Fleury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 10, 1984
106 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Fleury

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PETER FLEURY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Ramirez

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. We reject the defendant's claim that the showup conducted by the…

People v. Pointer, Frank

Accordingly, the issue is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, People v. Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818; People v.…