From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fillion

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 1990
160 A.D.2d 538 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

April 19, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.).


Based upon his extensive experience involving several hundred narcotics arrests and his observations of defendant, the arresting officer reasonably suspected that the duffle bag defendant put in the trunk of the car he was driving contained narcotics. The brief and cautionary police action of directing defendant to turn off the car ignition and step out of the vehicle when it was stopped at a red light was reasonable and constitutional under the circumstances (People v. Robinson, 74 N.Y.2d 773). Further, we agree with the hearing court's conclusion that defendant's consent to the search of the trunk and duffle bag therein was not coerced but was voluntary (see, People v Gonzalez, 39 N.Y.2d 122; People v. Zimmerman, 101 A.D.2d 294). Defendant was not in custody, the investigating officers had not drawn their weapons, and the encounter took place during daylight hours on a Manhattan public street.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Fillion

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 1990
160 A.D.2d 538 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Fillion

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL FILLION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1990

Citations

160 A.D.2d 538 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
554 N.Y.S.2d 188

Citing Cases

People v. Mercado

The police officer's response that defendant “wasn't necessarily going back to jail” to defendant's repeated…