From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fields

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 11, 2019
178 A.D.3d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2017-13242 Ind. No. 1015/16

12-11-2019

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. John FIELDS, appellant.

Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale, New York, of counsel), for appellant, and appellant pro se. Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Michael J. Brennan, New York, Grazia DiVincenzo, and Guy Arcidiacono, Riverhead, of counsel), for respondent.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale, New York, of counsel), for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Michael J. Brennan, New York, Grazia DiVincenzo, and Guy Arcidiacono, Riverhead, of counsel), for respondent.

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, ROBERT J. MILLER, HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Although the defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his plea of guilty survives his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 10, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022 ; People v. Kovalsky, 166 A.D.3d 900, 85 N.Y.S.3d 889 ; People v. Miller, 166 A.D.3d 812, 88 N.Y.S.3d 199 ), his contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw his plea or otherwise raise those contentions before the Supreme Court (see CPL 470.05[2] ; People v. Kovalsky, 166 A.D.3d at 901, 85 N.Y.S.3d 889 ; People v. Miller, 166 A.D.3d at 813, 88 N.Y.S.3d 199 ; People v. McClenic, 155 A.D.3d 1064, 64 N.Y.S.3d 554 ). In any event, his contentions are without merit (see People v. Peque, 22 N.Y.3d 168, 184–185, 980 N.Y.S.2d 280, 3 N.E.3d 617 ; People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338, 356, 287 N.Y.S.2d 659, 234 N.E.2d 687 ). The defendant's contention, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, that his attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel during the suppression hearing is not properly before this Court, since, by pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited appellate review of his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel that did not directly involve the plea negotiation process and sentence (see People v. David , 163 A.D.3d 846, 77 N.Y.S.3d 306 ; People v. Donovan , 133 A.D.3d 615, 20 N.Y.S.3d 96 ; People v. Williams , 129 A.D.3d 1000, 13 N.Y.S.3d 442 ).

BALKIN, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and LASALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Fields

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 11, 2019
178 A.D.3d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Fields

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. John Fields, appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Dec 11, 2019

Citations

178 A.D.3d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
111 N.Y.S.3d 904
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 8860

Citing Cases

People v. Arce

The defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree and two counts of attempted aggravated assault…

People v. Pena

In any event, the record reveals that the defendant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently…