From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fernandez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 31, 2015
126 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

03-31-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Francisco FERNANDEZ, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Marisa K. Cabrera of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Katherine A. Gregory of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Marisa K. Cabrera of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Katherine A. Gregory of counsel), for respondent.

TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, SAXE, MANZANET–DANIELS, KAPNICK, JJ.

Opinion Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), rendered September 27, 2013, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of endangering the welfare of a child and menacing in the third degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of three years' probation, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). There is no reason to disturb the court's credibility findings. The fact that the court acquitted defendant of attempted assault in the third degree does not warrant a different conclusion. That crime requires a specific intent to cause physical injury, and such intent is not required for either of the crimes of which defendant was convicted.


Summaries of

People v. Fernandez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 31, 2015
126 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Fernandez

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Francisco FERNANDEZ…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 31, 2015

Citations

126 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 2689
5 N.Y.S.3d 436

Citing Cases

People v. Babb

05 [1] ), whereas endangering the welfare of a child requires only that the defendant act knowingly (§ 15.05…

Figueroa v. Mazza

We will assume that if a reasonable officer were to view these photos knowing why they were produced, he…