From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Felder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 1988
143 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

October 17, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Heller, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

The defendant's conviction arises out of an incident in which the complainant was robbed of his school ring by an assailant who held a knife in his left hand. During the trial the defendant sought to establish through the testimony of his mother and sister that he was right handed in an attempt to prove that he could not have been the perpetrator. The court refused to permit the defendant to call these witnesses.

"Few rights are more fundamental than that of an accused to present witnesses in his own defense" (Chambers v Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 302). Thus the testimony of a defense witness should not be prospectively excluded unless it is offered in palpably bad faith (People v Gilliam, 37 N.Y.2d 722, revg 45 A.D.2d 744 on dissenting opn of Hopkins, J.; People v Westergard, 113 A.D.2d 640, 645, affd 69 N.Y.2d 642; People v Scott, 104 A.D.2d 667, 670). At bar, the proffered testimony was relevant to the accuracy of the complainant's identification and there is no indication that it was offered in palpably bad faith. Accordingly, the defendant should have been permitted to introduce the proposed testimony. This error deprived the defendant of a fair trial requiring a reversal of his conviction and a new trial.

However, we find no error in the refusal of the court to hear testimony concerning the lights on the roof of a grocery store which was located across the street from where the crime occurred. Under the circumstances of this case, the court properly found that such testimony was collateral and, therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's request to call the manager of the store (see, People v Harris, 57 N.Y.2d 335, 345, cert denied 460 U.S. 1047; People v Ventura, 35 N.Y.2d 654; cf., People v Schwartzman, 24 N.Y.2d 241, cert denied 396 U.S. 846; People v Hewlett, 133 A.D.2d 418, affd 71 N.Y.2d 841). Lawrence, J.P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Felder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 1988
143 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Felder

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH FELDER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 17, 1988

Citations

143 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Windley

The trial court was correct in denying this application since a mistrial is unwarranted when a less drastic…

People v. Kavazanjian

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Assuming that the trial court erred in preventing the defendant from…