From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fearon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1992
182 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 13, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The defendant was charged and tried with his codefendants Bruce Richardson and Martin Williams, both as a principal and on an acting in concert theory, in the commission of multiple acts of rape and sodomy against a single complainant (see, People v Richardson, 182 A.D.2d 721 [decided herewith]; People v Williams, 182 A.D.2d 733 [decided herewith]).

Although this defendant has argued that he was denied a fair trial by virtue of the admission of testimony which he claims constituted evidence of an "uncharged crime", we find that the disputed testimony was properly allowed to remain in evidence (see, People v Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233; People v Santarelli, 49 N.Y.2d 241, 247; see also, People v Richardson, 182 A.D.2d 721, supra).

Upon a review of the court's charge to the jury, we find that the court's instructions "adequately conveyed to the jury the appropriate standards" (see, People v Graziano, 151 A.D.2d 775, 776).

Upon our review of the record, including the pre-sentence report, we find that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in declining to grant this defendant youthful offender status (see, CPL 720.20 [a]) and we further conclude that there is no reason for this court to substitute its discretion for that of the sentencing court in order to accord this defendant youthful offender status (cf., People v Cruickshank, 105 A.D.2d 325, 335, affd sub nom. People v Dawn Maria C., 67 N.Y.2d 625). The sentence imposed upon the defendant was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

We have examined the defendant's remaining contention and find that it does not warrant reversal. Thompson, J.P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Fearon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1992
182 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Fearon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OTIS FEARON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Wills

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the…

People v. Wills

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the…