From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fauntleroy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 6, 2018
162 A.D.3d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

1996–10107 Ind. No. 9504/95

06-06-2018

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Kareem FAUNTLEROY, appellant.

Kareem Fauntleroy, Attica, N.Y., appellant pro se. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Julian Joiris of counsel), for respondent.


Kareem Fauntleroy, Attica, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Julian Joiris of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., MARK C. DILLON, LEONARD B. AUSTIN, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 22, 1999 ( People v. Fauntleroy, 258 A.D.2d 664, 683 N.Y.S.2d 916 ), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 15, 1996.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 ).

RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, AUSTIN and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Fauntleroy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 6, 2018
162 A.D.3d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Fauntleroy

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Kareem FAUNTLEROY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 6, 2018

Citations

162 A.D.3d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
74 N.Y.S.3d 769