From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Farrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 22, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, for a reconstruction hearing to determine whether the defendant was present at that portion of the Sandoval hearing conducted on October 24, 1990; the Supreme Court shall file its report with all deliberate speed.

Because the record is unclear as to whether the defendant was present during that portion of the Sandoval hearing held on October 24, 1990, and because the decision rendered was not "wholly favorable" to the defendant, this case must be remitted to the Supreme Court for a reconstruction hearing to determine this issue (see, People v. Odiat, 82 N.Y.2d 872; People v Michalek, 82 N.Y.2d 906; People v. Favor, 82 N.Y.2d 254; People v Dokes, 79 N.Y.2d 656). Bracken, J.P., Miller, O'Brien and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Farrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Farrell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH FARRELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 824

Citing Cases

People v. Smythe

The Supreme Court, Queens County, is to file its report with all convenient speed. Because the record is…

People v. Parchment

Ordered that the appeals are held in abeyance, and the matters are remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings…