Opinion
March 18, 1993
Appeal from the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.).
We reject defendant's contention that the description in the search warrant failed to sufficiently describe the premises to be searched. The description in a search warrant of a place to be searched will be found sufficient to satisfy constitutional requirements if it "is such that the officer * * * can with reasonable effort ascertain and identify the place intended" (Steele v. United States, 267 U.S. 498, 503; see, People v Davis, 146 A.D.2d 942). The search warrant in this case accurately described the premises to be searched and its general location. Although the warrant erroneously stated that the premises was the middle of three trailers at the site in question, the fact that the warrant also stated that the trailer was the residence of defendant allowed police to ascertain the target trailer "by minimal inquiry at the site, without there being anything but the remotest possibility that the wrong place would be searched" (People v. Davis, supra, at 944). Finally, we find that the affidavits attached to the search warrant application provided the basis for a description of the location of the premises to be searched sufficient to support the issuance of the warrant (see, People v. Rosenholn, 181 A.D.2d 943).
Weiss, P.J., Mikoll, Mercure, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.