From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Evans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 2008
56 A.D.3d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-02822.

November 12, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), rendered March 14, 2007, convicting him of promoting prison contraband in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Joseph A. Hanshe, Sayville, N.Y., for appellant.

Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Robert A. Schwartz and Llisa T. Fleischer of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Ritter, Carni and Dickerson, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633).

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not entitled to a missing witness charge ( see generally People v Savinon, 100 NY2d 192, 196; People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 427; see also People v Marino, 21 AD3d 430, 432).


Summaries of

People v. Evans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 2008
56 A.D.3d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HOWARD EVANS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 12, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8756
866 N.Y.S.2d 877

Citing Cases

People v. Michael Hall

Accordingly, the count of the indictment charging robbery in the first degree must be dismissed. Contrary to…

People v. John Freeman

Accordingly, the count of the indictment charging robbery in the first degree must be dismissed. Contrary to…