Opinion
April 1, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed.
On this appeal, heard together with the People's related appeals in People v. Oquendo ( 172 A.D.2d 566 [decided herewith]) and People v. Davis ( 172 A.D.2d 554 [decided herewith]), the People challenge the dismissal of an indictment on the ground that the defendant was deprived of his right to appear before the Grand Jury. As was the case in People v. Oquendo (supra), the defendant requested an opportunity to appear before the Grand Jury and was given a date and time at which to present himself. Again, as in People v. Oquendo (supra), the defendant's desire to appear before the Grand Jury was thwarted through the failure of the Department of Correction to produce him on time, and was further frustrated by the prosecutor's having the Grand Jury vote on the matter notwithstanding the inability of the defendant to appear before that body.
For the reasons stated in People v. Oquendo (supra), we conclude that the court properly dismissed the indictment. Bracken, J.P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.