From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. English

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1877
52 Cal. 212 (Cal. 1877)

Opinion

         Appeal from the County Court, County of Lake.

         The defendant and William Turner were jointly indicted for grand larceny, committed by stealing an ox on the 17th of October, 1876. The defendant had a separate trial. On the trial the prosecution called John Polson as a witness, and he was permitted, against the objection of the defendant, to testify that on the 17th of September, 1876, he was passing the slaughterhouse of Graham & Daily, about one o'clock at night, and saw an animal being drawn into it, and heard heavy blows, and that a short time after this he and Turner were crossing Cobb Mountain, and Turner said to him, when on Cobb Mountain, pointing to a certain place, " There is the place where I and English got that ox that there is so much fuss about." The prosecution, before this, had introduced evidence tending to prove that both Turner and English drove the ox to the slaughter-house on said night, and that its ears and hide had been found there the next day. The defendant was convicted, and appealed.

         COUNSEL:

         R. McGarvey and A. E. Noel, for the Appellant.

         Jo Hamilton, Attorney-General, for the People.


         OPINION          By the Court:

         The evidence of the declaration of Turner, made after the alleged offense was fully consummated, was not admissible against English, the only defendant on trial. (1 Bishop Crim. Proc. sec. igi.)

         Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

People v. English

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1877
52 Cal. 212 (Cal. 1877)
Case details for

People v. English

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE v. L. B. ENGLISH

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 1877

Citations

52 Cal. 212 (Cal. 1877)

Citing Cases

People v. Irwin

(1 Greenl. Ev., secs. 111, 233; People v. Moore , 45 Cal. 21; People v. English , 52 Cal. 212; People…

People v. Sidelinger

The action of the court upon this matter was clearly erroneous. ( People v. Smith, 151 Cal. 625, [ 91 P.…