From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Elkhoja

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 10, 2002
467 Mich. 916 (Mich. 2002)

Opinion

No. 122282 (70) (71) (74) (77).

December 10, 2002.


COA: 224126, Washtenaw CC: 99-012310-FC

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration and the motions to file briefs amicus curiae are considered, and they are GRANTED. The motion for peremptory reversal is also considered, and it is DENIED.

The delayed application for leave to appeal from the May 21, 2002 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the issues: (1) whether the circuit court's discovery order violated section 4 of the LEIN Policy Council Act, MCL 28.214, and if so, (2) whether defendant's constitutional rights would have been abridged had his request for such an order been denied.

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the question presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

People v. Elkhoja

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 10, 2002
467 Mich. 916 (Mich. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Elkhoja

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff, and CITY OF ANN ARBOR…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Dec 10, 2002

Citations

467 Mich. 916 (Mich. 2002)
655 N.W.2d 559

Citing Cases

People v. Henderson

However, the prosecution does not have an affirmative duty to engage in discovery on behalf of the defendant…

People v. Brown

Moreover, the prosecution does not have an affirmative duty to seek out and provide to a defendant LEIN…