From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Durant

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 1, 2014
121 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-10-1

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Lavell E. DURANT, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Paul Skip Laisure of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Sholom J. Twersky of counsel), for respondent.



Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Paul Skip Laisure of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Sholom J. Twersky of counsel), for respondent.
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, and HECTOR D. LaSALLE, JJ.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), rendered September 27, 2012, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, adjudicating him a second violent felony offender, and thereupon sentencing him to a determinate term of imprisonment of eight years, plus a period of five years of postrelease supervision.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the defendant's adjudication as a second violent felony offender and the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing in accordance herewith.

The defendant claims that his adjudication as a second violent felony offender was illegal because the predicate offense was not a felony under New York law. Although that contention is unpreserved for appellate review ( seeCPL 470.05 [2]; People v. Samms, 95 N.Y.2d 52, 57, 710 N.Y.S.2d 310, 731 N.E.2d 1118; People v. Iliff, 96 A.D.3d 974, 946 N.Y.S.2d 626), we reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

As the People correctly concede, the defendant's prior conviction of robbery with firearms or other dangerous weapons under North Carolina law does not constitute a predicate violent felony conviction ( seeN.C. Gen.Stat. § 14–87 [a]; Penal Law § 70.04[1][b][i] ). Accordingly, we modify the judgment by vacating the defendant's adjudication as a second violent felony offender and the sentence imposed thereon, and we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing ( see People v. Stevens, 114 A.D.3d 969, 980 N.Y.S.2d 841).


Summaries of

People v. Durant

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 1, 2014
121 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Durant

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Lavell E. DURANT, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 1, 2014

Citations

121 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
121 A.D.3d 709
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 6598

Citing Cases

People v. Salako

The People have the burden of establishing that the defendant was convicted of an offense in a foreign…

People v. Vasquez

The defendant contends that his adjudication as a second felony offender was illegal because the predicate…