From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dufresne

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 18, 2022
209 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

16467 Ind. No. 2824/11 Case No. 2019–5054

10-18-2022

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jean DUFRESNE, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Shaina R. Watrous of counsel), for appellant. Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Amanda Katherine Regan of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Shaina R. Watrous of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Amanda Katherine Regan of counsel), for respondent.

Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Webber, Singh, Moulton, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), entered on or about May 13, 2019, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent predicate offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently rejected defendant's request for an indefinite adjournment of his sex offender classification hearing based on the pendency of an article 10 civil commitment proceeding (see e.g. People v. Boone, 202 A.D.3d 449, 158 N.Y.S.3d 579 [1st Dept. 2022], lv granted 38 N.Y.3d 908, 2022 WL 1633554 [2022] ; People v. Blum, 166 A.D.3d 571, 86 N.Y.S.3d 872 [1st Dept. 2018], lv denied 32 N.Y.3d 918, 2019 WL 1348080 [2019] ). Defendant's constitutional argument is unpreserved, and is without merit in any event.


Summaries of

People v. Dufresne

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 18, 2022
209 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Dufresne

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jean Dufresne…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 18, 2022

Citations

209 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 5802
175 N.Y.S.3d 216

Citing Cases

People v. Brunache

The court providently exercised its discretion in declining to defer adjudication of defendant's sex…