Opinion
June 16, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eiber, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
The commission of the burglary by the defendant was established beyond a reasonable doubt in that the defendant was found in conscious, recent and exclusive possession of the fruits of the crime and did not offer any credible explanation as to how those fruits were obtained (see, People v. Shurn, 69 A.D.2d 64).
The other claims asserted by the defendant on appeal relate to matters which were not raised at trial and therefore are unpreserved for review as a matter of law (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Thomas, 50 N.Y.2d 467). Bracken, J.P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.