From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dotson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 13, 1998
248 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 13, 1998

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Maloy, J. — Rape, 1st Degree.

Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: County Court erred in failing to conduct an inquiry of a juror who disclosed during deliberations that she "was almost raped once myself". Because defendant was being tried for a sexual assault that included a charge of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35), the court was required to make a "probing and tactful inquiry" of the juror "in camera in the presence of the attorneys and defendant" to determine if she was "grossly unqualified" to serve (People v. Buford, 69 N.Y.2d 290, 299; see, CPL 270.35). The court failed to conduct any inquiry, and its implied finding that the juror was not grossly unqualified rests upon speculation (see, People v. Buford, supra, at 299; People v. McClenton, 213 A.D.2d 1, 2, appeal dismissed 88 N.Y.2d 872). The error is not subject to harmless error analysis (see, People v. Anderson, 70 N.Y.2d 729, 730); therefore, the judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted. While we do not conclude that the court's charge on the presumption of innocence requires reversal, we strongly recommend that language based upon the pattern jury charge be used (see, 1 CJI[NY] 3.05). We have considered the remaining contentions of defendant and conclude that they are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Dotson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 13, 1998
248 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Dotson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTONIO DOTSON, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 147

Citing Cases

People v. Porter

Here, the inquiry conducted by the Supreme Court fell short of that required by Buford. Once the juror…

People v. Ventura

We conclude that there should have been an inquiry, in which defense counsel could participate, because the…