From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dixon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2019
168 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8292 Ind. 2578/16

01-31-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sharina DIXON, Defendant–Appellant.

Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Heidi Bota of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.


Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Heidi Bota of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Dixon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2019
168 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Dixon

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sharina DIXON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 31, 2019

Citations

168 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
91 N.Y.S.3d 689