From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dinkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 2000
278 A.D.2d 43 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 7, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered June 23, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of burglary in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Williams, Andrias, Buckley, Friedman, JJ.

Rona Feinberg, for respondent.

Lisa Lewis, for defendant-appellant.


The court properly exercised its discretion in limiting questioning of prospective jurors (see, People v. Boulware, 29 N.Y.2d 135, cert denied 405 U.S. 995). Since the court itself adequately covered the jurors' obligation to draw no inference from the absence of testimony by a defendant, the court properly limited further inquiry on the same subject (compare, People v. Wongshing, 245 A.D.2d 186, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 978, with People v. Porter, 226 A.D.2d 275). The court did not abuse its discretion in curtailing questioning about the details of jurors' occupational duties. Defendant's unpreserved complaint about the court's limitation of the prosecutor's voir dire is unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Dinkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 2000
278 A.D.2d 43 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Dinkins

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. MICHAEL DINKINS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 7, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 43 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
717 N.Y.S.2d 167

Citing Cases

People v. Brown

Defendant's claim that the court improperly prevented his counsel from asking jurors “whether the HIV…