From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dillon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 27, 1995
87 N.Y.2d 885 (N.Y. 1995)

Opinion

Decided December 27, 1995

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Jeffrey G. Berry, J.

Gary Abramson, Goshen, for Daniel Dillon, appellant.

Gurda, Gurda Smith, Middletown (Alex Smith of counsel), for Roy Hetzel, appellant.

Francis D. Phillips, II, District Attorney of Orange County, Goshen (David R. Huey of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

During the course of a high-speed automobile chase having its inception in a traffic violation, the pursuing State Trooper observed the passenger in the fleeing vehicle, defendant Dillon, throw two small bags onto the roadway. The chase continued for another 10 to 15 miles until the driver, defendant Hetzel, was eventually stopped. Approximately 3.94 ounces of a white powder containing cocaine and eight hypodermic needles were recovered from the roadside at the point where the bags had been thrown.

There was sufficient circumstantial evidence from which the Grand Jury could have inferred that defendants Dillon and Hetzel had knowledge that the cocaine weighed more than the statutory minimum of an aggregate two ounces, and therefore, County Court erred in reducing count one of the indictment from criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18) to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03).

Given the lesser standards for measuring the sufficiency of Grand Jury instructions (see, People v Darby, 75 N.Y.2d 449, 454; People v Calbud, Inc., 49 N.Y.2d 389, 394; see also, CPL 190.30), we also conclude that the instructions in this case were adequate.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Dillon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 27, 1995
87 N.Y.2d 885 (N.Y. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Dillon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL DILLON and ROY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 27, 1995

Citations

87 N.Y.2d 885 (N.Y. 1995)
639 N.Y.S.2d 1007
663 N.E.2d 319

Citing Cases

People v. Washington

The Penal Law provides that the presence of a controlled substance in an automobile is presumptive evidence…

People v. Waasdorp

The People presented evidence that defendant possessed 11.9 ounces of marihuana hidden in a plastic bag in…