Opinion
December 7, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court did not err in admitting evidence of the defendant's involvement in another robbery since a modus operandi probative on the issue of identity was established ( see, People v. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264; People v. Delarosa, 218 A.D.2d 667; People v. Odenthal, 217 A.D.2d 412; People v. Jason, 190 A.D.2d 689).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Woodruff 237 A.D.2d 548; People v. Gonzalez, 187 A.D.2d 607; People v. Caban, 129 A.D.2d 721; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245), or without merit.
Pizzuto, J.P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.