From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1985
111 A.D.2d 252 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

May 13, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dubin, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Our review of the evidence adduced at trial demonstrates that any rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant's attack upon the complainant was not justified. The People's evidence established that defendant was the initial aggressor, that the complainant was not armed, and that defendant shot the complainant twice, once in the back. The jury chose to believe the People's witnesses and, in the absence of any indication that their testimony was incredible as a matter of law, this court will not supplant the jury's judgment ( see, Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, reh denied 444 U.S. 890; People v. Regina, 19 N.Y.2d 65).

Additionally, the certified hospital records of complainant's treatment after the incident were properly admitted into evidence and are competent proof of the wounds received by him ( see, CPL 60.10; CPLR 4518 [a], [c]). The courts have consistently recognized that such records are admissible in a criminal trial notwithstanding the lack of an opportunity to confront and cross-examine the declarant ( see, People v. Sanders, 56 N.Y.2d 51, 63; People v. Nisonoff, 293 N.Y. 597, 601-603; People v. Klein, 105 A.D.2d 805). Defendant's counsel was free to attempt to controvert the medical evidence, which he chose not to do.

Defense counsel's failure to object to the prosecutor's improper inquiry regarding defendant's pretrial silence does not rise to the level necessary to sustain a finding of ineffective assistance of counsel ( Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S Ct 2052; People v. Karamanites, 104 A.D.2d 899). Defendant's other claims of deficient performance by his counsel are without merit.

Finally, we find that the court did not abuse its discretion by sentencing defendant to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 5 to 15 years in light of defendant's violent, unprovoked conduct ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1985
111 A.D.2d 252 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL DAVIS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 13, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 252 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

The court's determination that the police did not intentionally deprive defendant of access to his family in…

People v. Rodriguez

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's trial attorney provided meaningful representation (…