From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Daugenti

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Tehama
Dec 31, 2007
No. C055263 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 31, 2007)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSEPH DAUGENTI, Defendant and Appellant. C055263 California Court of Appeal, Third District, Tehama December 31, 2007

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Super. Ct. No. NCR70400

SCOTLAND, P.J.

During a parole search on October 26, 2006, defendant Joseph Daugenti was found possessing 12.6 grams of methamphetamine in four separate packages. He entered a negotiated plea of no contest to possessing methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378), admitted having two prior narcotics convictions (Health & Saf. Code, § 11370.2, subd. (c)), and was sentenced to nine years in state prison and ordered to pay various fines and fees.

Defendant appealed, and we appointed counsel to represent him on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks us to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant.

Having undertaken an independent examination of the record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

The judgment is affirmed.

We concur: SIMS, J., MORRISON, J.


Summaries of

People v. Daugenti

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Tehama
Dec 31, 2007
No. C055263 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 31, 2007)
Case details for

People v. Daugenti

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSEPH DAUGENTI, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Third District, Tehama

Date published: Dec 31, 2007

Citations

No. C055263 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 31, 2007)