From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dalton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 5, 1998
247 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 5, 1998

Appeal from the County Court of Columbia County (Czajka, J.).


On March 17, 1996, defendant was sentenced to time served and concurrent terms of five years' probation upon his plea of guilty to two felony counts of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Shortly thereafter, defendant pleaded guilty to violating the terms of his probation by consuming alcohol and failing to inform his probation officer of his change of address. As a result, County Court revoked defendant's probation and resentenced him to two concurrent prison terms of 1 to 3 years. Defendant contends that the sentence was harsh and excessive. We disagree. Considering defendant's prior alcohol-related conviction, his admission that he had violated the terms of his probation three times within eight months following the grant of probation, and there being no extraordinary circumstances warranting our intervention, we find the sentence, which was within the statutory parameters and in accordance with the plea agreement, neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v. Recor, 209 A.D.2d 831, 832, affd 87 N.Y.2d 983; People v. Spratt, 135 A.D.2d 983, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 903).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Dalton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 5, 1998
247 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Dalton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS J. DALTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 950

Citing Cases

People v. Sterling

After defendant was arrested in South Carolina and convicted of burglary and petit larceny charges, he was…

People v. Pearl

We disagree. Neither defendant nor his attorney requested an updated report and the record reflects that the…