From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Curtin

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 21, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50455 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Opinion

2002-1188 SCR.

Decided May 21, 2004.

Appeal by defendant from judgments of the Justice Court, Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County (R. Walker, J.), rendered July 16, 2002, convicting him of violating East Hampton Town Ordinance 246 sections 13 and 14, and sentencing him to fines of $100 on each violation.

Judgments of conviction unanimously reversed upon the law, appearance tickets dismissed and fines, if paid, remitted.

PRESENT: McCABE, P.J., RUDOLPH and ANGIOLILLO, JJ.


Appearance tickets/summonses are not accusatory instruments and their filing does not give a criminal court jurisdiction over the named defendant. Thus, the failure to file with the court proper accusatory instruments charging the person named in the appearance tickets with the offenses specified therein mandates reversal of the judgments of conviction and dismissal of the summonses ( see People v. Cooperman and O'Dell, NYLJ, Jan. 17, 1989 [App Term, 9th 10th Jud Dists]).


Summaries of

People v. Curtin

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 21, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50455 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)
Case details for

People v. Curtin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BRAD J. CURTIN…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 21, 2004

Citations

2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50455 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Citing Cases

People v. Apollo

The record herein contained only an appearance ticket/summons relative to the alleged violation of section…