From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Curkendall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 2, 1988
141 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

June 2, 1988

Appeal from the County Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.).


On September 26, 1986, after consuming several beers and glasses of whiskey, defendant was involved in an auto accident when he failed to observe an intersection stop sign and collided with another car, causing serious personal injuries to a passenger. Defendant pleaded guilty to vehicular assault in the second degree, a class E felony, receiving a sentence of five years' probation and reparation of $5,000 to the victims. He also pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated, a class A misdemeanor, receiving a sentence of one year in jail and a $500 fine. On this appeal, defendant challenges the legality of the sentence.

When, as here, a court sentences a defendant for more than one crime, a sentence of imprisonment may be coupled with a sentence of probation but only within the limitations set forth in Penal Law § 60.01 (2) (d) (see, Penal Law § 65.00). By imposing a sentence in excess of 60 days on the misdemeanor concomitantly with a sentence of 5 years' probation for the felony conviction, County Court failed to comply with the statutory proscriptions (see, People v Bucci, 122 A.D.2d 562). The error is further compounded by the fact that the sentencing terms emanated from the negotiated plea agreement. Any conditions of a plea agreement, however, must be lawful (People v Selikoff, 35 N.Y.2d 227, 238, cert denied 419 U.S. 1122). Since the negotiated terms of sentence were statutorily unauthorized, the underlying plea agreement was invalid from its inception (supra; see, People v Felman, 137 A.D.2d 341; see also, People v Montgomery, 115 A.D.2d 102, 103). Under these circumstances, we deem it appropriate to vacate defendant's plea of guilty and remit the matter for further proceedings on the indictment (supra).

Judgment reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, guilty plea vacated, and matter remitted to the County Court of Chemung County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court's decision. Mahoney, P.J., Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., Harvey and Mercure, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Curkendall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 2, 1988
141 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Curkendall

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL CURKENDALL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1988

Citations

141 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Latzen

We agree. Defendant may not receive at the same sentencing a term of five years' probation on one conviction…

People v. Clinch

We disagree. In cases where the sentence negotiated at the pleading stage of the case was unauthorized, the…