From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cunningham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 28, 2003
307 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1998-04025

Submitted June 17, 2003.

July 28, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered April 27, 1998, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress his written statement to law enforcement authorities.

Estelle Jana Roond, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., SANDRA L. TOWNES, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress his written statement to the police. The hearing court correctly found that the defendant's right to counsel had not indelibly attached before he gave the inculpatory statement (see People v. Grice, 293 A.D.2d 756, affd 100 N.Y.2d 318 [June 26, 2003]; People v. Pulliam, 292 A.D.2d 399; People v. Lennon, 243 A.D.2d 495; cf. People v. Garafolo, 46 N.Y.2d 592; People v. Pinzon, 44 N.Y.2d 458). "The hearing court's finding should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record" (People v. Grice, supra; see People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86, 88). As the record supports the hearing court's determination, we agree that there was no basis to suppress the statement.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

PRUDENTI, P.J., TOWNES, MASTRO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cunningham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 28, 2003
307 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Cunningham

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. FRANK CUNNINGHAM, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 28, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 826

Citing Cases

People v. Lawes

In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit. The factual findings and credibility…

People v. Allenye

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion…