From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cunningham

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 30, 2019
171 A.D.3d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9142-9142A Ind. 4342/13, 2338/14

04-30-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jarell CUNNINGHAM, Defendant–Appellant.

Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Jeffrey Dellheim of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Valerie Figueredo of counsel), for respondent.


Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Jeffrey Dellheim of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Valerie Figueredo of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Richter, Gesmer, Kern, Singh, JJ.

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Cunningham

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 30, 2019
171 A.D.3d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Cunningham

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jarell CUNNINGHAM…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 30, 2019

Citations

171 A.D.3d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
97 N.Y.S.3d 472

Citing Cases

People v. Cunningham

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 171 AD3d 669 (NY)…