From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Culpepper

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 27, 1973
307 N.E.2d 48 (N.Y. 1973)

Opinion

Argued November 20, 1973

Decided December 27, 1973

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, DOMINIC S. RINALDI, J.

Alan J. Konigsberg, William E. Hellerstein and Robert Kasanof for appellant.

Eugene Gold, District Attorney ( J. Mitchell Rosenberg of counsel), for respondent.


Order modified and case remitted to Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum, and, as so modified, affirmed: Each of defendant's convictions is affirmed. No warrant appears in this record, however, for the increase in defendant's sentences predicated on his contumacious remark to the court. While we have sympathy for the feelings of the sentencing Judge, the increase cannot be justified under sentencing procedures nor supported under the guise of punishment for contempt of court. Accordingly, defendant's sentence is vacated and the case is remitted with a direction to resentence defendant to the sentence originally imposed.

Concur: Judges BURKE, BREITEL, JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER. Taking no part: Chief Judge FULD.


Summaries of

People v. Culpepper

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 27, 1973
307 N.E.2d 48 (N.Y. 1973)
Case details for

People v. Culpepper

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RODNEY CULPEPPER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 27, 1973

Citations

307 N.E.2d 48 (N.Y. 1973)
307 N.E.2d 48
351 N.Y.S.2d 976

Citing Cases

People v. Brooks

In any event, counsel's failure to call this witness could not have deprived defendant of a fair trial. As…

People v. Adams

Second, even assuming, arguendo, that the court properly sentenced defendant as a second felony offender, we…